Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-05-18 | -- |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than the vivo X80 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's processor is very similar to the vivo X80 Pro one, they have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a slightly better display than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1440 x 3088 resolution, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a much brighter display.
Vivo X80 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra feature really similar memory capacity for apps and games, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit superior battery lifetime than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 6 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and a 0.77 inches back camera sensor, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.