Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. The Galaxy S7 is an a lot older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. Vivo X80 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a much larger screen, a really brighter display and a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a very superior processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser CPU cores and less RAM. Vivo X80 Pro has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X80 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better low light photos, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos. The vivo X80 Pro has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.