Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. The Galaxy S7 Active is an extremely older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy S7 Active has a very superior performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution, way more brightness and a lot bigger display. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X80 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a lot better video definition, a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Vivo X80 Pro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.