Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is better than vivo X80 Pro, with a global score of 81.7 against 72.6. Even though the Galaxy S8 is extremely older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's body is noticeably lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger screen. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a way higher video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 57 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.