Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is better than vivo X80 Pro, with a overall score of 81.9 against 72.6. Despite of the fact Galaxy S8 Active is noticeably older and a little thicker than the vivo X80 Pro, it's body is still just a bit lighter. The Galaxy S8 Active has a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X80 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The vivo X80 Pro features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X80 Pro has better battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a larger aperture, a lot higher video resolution, a camera with a much better 50 MP resolution and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.