Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than vivo X80 Pro, getting an 80.1 score against 72.6. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than vivo X80 Pro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a way larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The vivo X80 Pro has a greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a camera in the back with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.