Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, with an 81 score against 72.6. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the vivo X80 Pro, it must be told that it is also a way older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much greater performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a larger aperture, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X80 Pro has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X80 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.