Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro, having an 88.5 score against 72.6. These devices include the same Android 12 OS (operating system). The Galaxy Z Flip body is noticeably thinner and lighter than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a quite better screen pixels density, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy Z Flip's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as vivo X80 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X80 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The vivo X80 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a lot higher video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.