Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is way better than vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but it's noticeably thinner and lighter anyway.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot better performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X80 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a much better video resolution and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to vivo X80 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.