Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a global score of 94.6 against 72.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and way heavier cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it noticeably thinner anyway.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processing unit than vivo X80 Pro. They have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the vivo X80 Pro, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Vivo X80 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video, a lot better video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.