Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker device than vivo X80 Pro. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X80 Pro has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a way worse 50 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture, a way higher video definition and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as vivo X80 Pro's one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.