Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is a bit better than the vivo X80 Pro's overall score of 72.6. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is older than vivo X80 Pro, it's body is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a better pixels count in each inch in the display and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an extremely better processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a higher resolution camera and a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.