Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is just a little thinner and just a little lighter than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a quite bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The vivo X80 Pro features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X80 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a lot higher video definition and a way bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.