Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is just a bit better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an way older phone than the vivo X80 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to build it just a little lighter and a little bit thinner.
Vivo X80 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little larger screen and a higher screen density. The vivo X80 Pro has a greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a back-facing camera with a higher resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little better battery life than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.