Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than the vivo X80, getting an 84.2 score against 74.1. IPhone XS's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the vivo X80, even though it was released many years before. The iPhone XS features a bit better performance than vivo X80, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The vivo X80 features a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and much more display brightness. The vivo X80 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X80 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X80 also has a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs. The vivo X80 has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 69% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.