Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than vivo X80's 74.1 global score. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4 is notably older than vivo X80, it's body is extremely lighter and just a bit thinner. The vivo X80 has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X80 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X80 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit worse pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display. The vivo X80 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Vivo X80 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X80 features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.