Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than vivo X80, with a overall score of 82.9 against 74.1. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than vivo X80, even though it was released 3 years before. Vivo X80 features a bit better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Vivo X80 has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X80 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X80 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Vivo X80 features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.