Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than the vivo X80, with an 89 score against 74.1. The Google Pixel 5 is an older phone than the vivo X80, but Google managed to make it noticeably lighter and just a little thinner. The vivo X80 features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 5. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The vivo X80 has a better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger display. The Google Pixel 5 features a camera that's very similar to vivo X80's camera, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a much tinier back camera sensor and a camera in the back with a way lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Google Pixel 5's storage for apps and games is very similar to the vivo X80 one, both have equal internal storage. The vivo X80 counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.