Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is slightly better than vivo X80, having a 77 score against 74.1. Despite of the fact that HTC U Ultra is a lot older than vivo X80, it's design is lighter and just a little thinner. The vivo X80 has a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Vivo X80 features a little bit better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse display density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Vivo X80 takes a bit better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X80 also has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger back camera sensor.
HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X80 has a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.