Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than vivo X80, having a 77.6 score against 74.1. Despite of the fact that the HTC U11 is notably older than the vivo X80, it's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. The vivo X80 features a little sharper display than HTC U11, because although it has a lot less pixels per inch of display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen.
Vivo X80 features a bit faster processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X80 counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos.
The vivo X80 has slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X80 features a superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.