Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X80's 74.1 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ is an noticeably older device than vivo X80, but LG managed to build it lighter and thinner. The vivo X80 has a little faster processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X80 has a little bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower pixel count per inch in the display and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Vivo X80 shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ features much more storage to store more games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X80 features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.