Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the vivo X80, getting an 81.2 score against 74.1. LG V40 ThinQ's body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo X80, even though it was released 4 years before. These devices come with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while vivo X80 has Android 12.
Vivo X80 features a bit superior processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X80 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X80 has a little more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ's camera is just as good as the camera in vivo X80, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way smaller back camera sensor which provides a way lower image and video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than vivo X80, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X80 counts with better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.