Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Interstellar Black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the vivo X80, having an 83.4 score against 74.1. Although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit thicker than vivo X80, it's just a little bit lighter and also newer. These devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version, providing the user lots of additional features and better performance.
Vivo X80 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the vivo X80 also counts with a brighter screen and a quite bigger display.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X80, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X80 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than vivo X80, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality, they both have the same diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with a 50 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X80, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.