Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Sonic silver |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X80's 74.1 general score. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it is also older, just a little heavier and thicker. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has the previous 10 version and vivo X80 has Android 12.
The vivo X80 counts with just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, much more brightness, a little bit larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The vivo X80 features a bit superior CPU than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the vivo X80, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a lot better photos and videos than vivo X80, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a battery performance that's just as good as the vivo X80 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.