Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a score of 79.6, which is slightly better than vivo X80's 74.1 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A40 is older than the vivo X80, it's design is a lot lighter and just a bit thinner. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A40 has 11 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version.
The vivo X80 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. The vivo X80 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X80 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A40 counts with more storage for applications and games than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo X80 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The vivo X80 takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.