Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is much better than the vivo X80, having a global score of 81.7 against 74.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A41 is older than the vivo X80, it's design is much lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A41 has 11 version and vivo X80 has Android 12.
The vivo X80 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM memory. The vivo X80 features a better screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features a better memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than vivo X80, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, a lot smaller sensor and a camera in the back with a worse resolution.
The vivo X80 has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.