Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is a bit better than vivo X80, getting a 75.8 score against 74.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is older than vivo X80, it's design is noticeably lighter and just a bit thinner. The vivo X80 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much larger screen.
Vivo X80 has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X80 features a little better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Vivo X80 features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Vivo X80 captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.