Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the vivo X80, having an 83.8 score against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is lighter and a bit thinner than vivo X80, even though it was released 3 years before. The vivo X80 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM.
Vivo X80 features a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger screen. The vivo X80 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X80 counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.