Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is better than vivo X80's 74.1 global score. The Galaxy A50s body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo X80, although it was released 3 years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and vivo X80 has Android 12.
The vivo X80 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X80 also has 2 GB more RAM. Vivo X80 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo X80 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a superior camera than vivo X80, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, a back camera with lesser mega-pixels and a much tinier camera sensor which offers a lot lower image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.