Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the vivo X80's 74.1 global score. Although Galaxy A51 is incredibly older than vivo X80, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while vivo X80 has Android 12.
The vivo X80 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A51 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X80 counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X80 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A51 has a superior camera than vivo X80, although it has a back camera with less mega pixels, a smaller aperture and a lot smaller camera sensor offering a lot worse image quality.
Vivo X80 features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.