Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism cube black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than vivo X80's 74.1 overall score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while vivo X80 has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an older and a little thicker phone than the vivo X80, but Samsung was able to make it a little bit lighter anyway.
Vivo X80 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X80 also has more RAM memory. Vivo X80 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in vivo X80.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than vivo X80, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments and a way tinier sensor taking much worse quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.