Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the vivo X80, with a score of 91.3 against 74.1. The Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the vivo X80, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 12 operating system. Vivo X80 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The vivo X80 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X80 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X80 and Galaxy A52 5G both have extremely similar battery performance. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than vivo X80, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.