Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is a bit better than vivo X80, getting a 76.9 score against 74.1. The Galaxy A70 is an older cellphone than vivo X80, but Samsung could make it a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and vivo X80 has Android 12. The vivo X80 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X80 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Vivo X80 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a just a little lower pixel number in each inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a very superior storage for games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The vivo X80 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality. Galaxy A70 features a battery duration that is just as good as the battery lifetime in vivo X80.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.