Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than vivo X80, with an 87.5 score against 74.1. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while vivo X80 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A71's design is just a bit thinner and lighter than vivo X80, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The vivo X80 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a just a little lower pixels count in each display inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit larger display. The vivo X80 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A71 takes much better photographs and videos than vivo X80, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A71 has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X80, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a battery duration that is very similar to vivo X80's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.