Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than the vivo X80's overall score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a little bit lighter phone than the vivo X80, but they are equally thin. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version.
The vivo X80 features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater storage for games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The vivo X80 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW. They have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes much better videos and photos than vivo X80, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and vivo X80 have similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.