Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is much better than vivo X80's 74.1 general score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version and vivo X80 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy F41 is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X80, but Samsung was able to build it just a little lighter anyway.
Vivo X80 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Vivo X80 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X80 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy F41 has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a superior camera than vivo X80, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy F41 has improved battery life than vivo X80, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.