Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the vivo X80, getting a 97.6 score against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a notably older and notably heavier phone than the vivo X80, but Samsung made it thinner anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X80 has Android 12 version, counting with a couple additional features and improved performance.
Galaxy Fold's processor is very similar to the processing unit in vivo X80, and although the Galaxy Fold has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X80 has a more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than vivo X80, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a camera that's just as good as vivo X80's camera, because although the Galaxy Fold has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The vivo X80 features a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.