Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 is better than vivo X80, getting a overall score of 85 against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy M40 design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than vivo X80, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M40 has older 10 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version.
Vivo X80 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X80 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy M40 captures clearer videos and photos than vivo X80, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light environments. Galaxy M40 features a much greater storage for games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M40 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X80 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.