Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than vivo X80's 74.1 score. The Galaxy Note 20 body has the same thickness than the vivo X80, but it's just a little bit lighter. The vivo X80 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the vivo X80 one, they have the same internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20's processing unit is just as good as vivo X80's processor, they have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. Vivo X80 counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better camera than vivo X80, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 MP resolution and a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.