Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than vivo X80, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 74.1. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while vivo X80 has Android 12, so it gives a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a little thinner than vivo X80, although it is just a bit heavier and was released around 20 months before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processor than vivo X80, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X80 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a little inferior pixels amount in each inch of display, a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than vivo X80, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality pictures. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a battery performance that's very similar to the battery life in vivo X80.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.