Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than vivo X80, getting a general score of 79.3 against 74.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note 5 is a lot older than the vivo X80, it's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and vivo X80 has Android 12.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X80, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Vivo X80 has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X80 has a superior processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster). The vivo X80 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50% bigger battery size. Vivo X80 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.