Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is a bit better than the vivo X80's 74.1 global score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition body is just a bit thinner and lighter than vivo X80, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The vivo X80 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display.
Vivo X80 counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X80 also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X80 captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit more storage to install applications and games than vivo X80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Vivo X80 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.