Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the vivo X80, getting an 89 score against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo X80, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The vivo X80 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note10. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
Vivo X80 has a better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a camera that's just as good as the camera in vivo X80, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a lot tinier back camera sensor taking much lower quality pictures and a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has much more storage to install games and applications than vivo X80, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X80 has better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.