Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the vivo X80, having a global score of 86.2 against 74.1. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while vivo X80 has Android 12. The Galaxy Note10 Lite is a notably older and just a little thicker phone than vivo X80, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit lighter anyway.
The vivo X80 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X80 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X80 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit lower display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the vivo X80 also counts with a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better storage to store more apps and games than vivo X80, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite takes a little bit better videos and photos than vivo X80, because although it has a much tinier sensor and a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos.
Galaxy Note10 Lite and vivo X80 have really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.