Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the vivo X80, with an 80.2 score against 74.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note5 is extremely older than vivo X80, it's construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The vivo X80 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X80 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display. Vivo X80 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note5, because it has a camera with a way higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video and a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The vivo X80 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X80 has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.