Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is better than vivo X80, with a score of 83 against 74.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note8 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X80 has Android 12 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy Note8 body is just a little bit lighter than vivo X80, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released 5 years before.
Vivo X80 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a lot lesser pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Vivo X80 has a little faster processor than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X80 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. Vivo X80 counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
The vivo X80 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.