Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than vivo X80's 74.1 overall score. Galaxy S10 Lite is an notably older phone than the vivo X80, but Samsung made it a bit lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Vivo X80 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X80 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a quite bigger display. The Galaxy S10 Lite takes much clearer pictures and videos than vivo X80, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with lesser mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than vivo X80, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the vivo X80 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.