Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the vivo X80's overall score of 74.1. Galaxy S10e's design is notably lighter and just a bit thinner than vivo X80, even though it was released many years before. The vivo X80 features a sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels count in each inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Vivo X80 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X80 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10e features a much better storage to install games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S10e and vivo X80 count with really similar cameras, because although the Galaxy S10e has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels and a much smaller back camera sensor taking much lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments.
The vivo X80 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.