Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than the vivo X80, with a overall score of 94.8 against 74.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has 13 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy S20 design is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the vivo X80, even though it was released many years before.
The vivo X80 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot lower pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 and vivo X80 count with quite similar processors, and although the Galaxy S20 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X80 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 13% more battery size. The Galaxy S20 captures clearer pictures and videos than vivo X80, although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution and a smaller camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.