Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the vivo X80's global score of 74.1. Even being the best phone in this review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a incredibly older, a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than vivo X80. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and vivo X80 has Android 12, providing the user some nice extra features.
Vivo X80 has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite smaller display and a little worse screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage for games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and vivo X80 have quite similar processing units, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better battery performance than vivo X80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than vivo X80, because although it has a way smaller sensor capturing lot lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.